Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- estes_i_am_a_man [2026/04/22 20:08] – nrutkows
+++ estes_i_am_a_man [2026/04/24 14:37] (current) – smilton
@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 In addition to groups like the Black Panther Party, Estes details other civil rights organizations like the Invaders, who were mostly young, black, self-described "radical" men. To the Invaders, even just learning to survive in a very racist society was a kind of rite of passage into manhood in and of itself, offering a much different view of manhood and its traditions and qualifications than what is typically seen in white middle-class groups. Unlike Martin Luther King Jr., the Invaders believed that violent protest could be necessary, and many of them seized the opportunity to participate in violent protest during the Beale Street march. (Noah Rutkowski)
+Estes starts with talking about masculinity in terms of the Moynihan Reoprt, specifically the debate of black masculinity and how it shifted in the 1960's. Moynihan argued that many of the struggles in African American communities, such as generational poverty, unemployment, and instability, came from black families, specifically the lack of a male figure present. He does, however, say that this is not a fault of the families, rather of a racist society. Estes critiques this by putting it in a historical context. He flips the arguemtn on its head by arguing that the problems faced were due to systemic discrimination, not the other way around, turning the problems from being the cause to being the effect. -Caroline Cochran
+Estes also talks about the militant expression of black masculinity. He lays out that, because of non-violent efforts being met with violence and discrimination from the government, some advocates started rejecting ideas of respectability and integration in the eyes of white people. Masculinity turned into an emphasis on self-defense, autonomy, and pride. An example of this was the Black Panther Party. Masculinity became a central organizational message and language. There was an emphasis onreclaiming manhood and black masculinity. At the same time, this reinforced patriarchal ideas and often sidelined women, especially black women who were often part of these movements as well. -Caroline Cochran
+Estes also writes about the Memphis Sanitation Worker Strike and how that reflected ideas of black masculinbity and humanity. This strike wasn't inherently about wages and working conditions, but more about dignity and manhood. Black workers were treated as disposable labor and were denied all respect as men. This linked to ideas of perpetual boyhood. They weren't arguing that they were men as in not women, instead they were men as in not boys. They were using masculinity as the right to be recognized as fully human and fully man. Martin Luther King jr. was also an important part of this strike. He argued that equality wa more than just the absense of legal segregation, but asz economic justice and recognition of dignity. -Caroline Cochran
+Estes uses the Moynihan report as a way to show how the issues surrounding the lack of upward class mobility for African American men was due to the continuous removal or refusal to make support systems for these men to use. This report was used by President Johnson to make light of the situation at hand and to create more support or structure to the African American families. And for these men to participate in the American ideals for masculinity and patriarchy. (Sage Milton)
+The ideals for American masculinity viewed men as the bread-winners of their houses, so having women being the main providers for the family removes the connection to masculinity from the African American men if they are unemployed. In Moynihan's report he discussed how the lack of a father was creating less men when only the mothers' are raising the sons and it is a failure of the family system as a whole. (Sage Milton)