Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- manion_female_husbands [2026/04/07 13:58] – khamilt3
+++ manion_female_husbands [2026/04/10 01:02] (current) – 76.78.172.129
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-**Introduction:**
+====== Female Husbands ======
+===== Introduction: =====
 J. Marion’s text examines the history of female husbands in 18th and 19th-century America and the United Kingdom. As part of her analysis, the author emphasizes the unique position of the wives of female husbands. According to Marion, they have been understudied and underrepresented, as most accounts have focused primarily on female husbands themselves. However, the lack of sufficient representation is not justified, as wives played a crucial role in the social perception of the female husbands as well as in their husbands’ identity. Moreover, wives were capable of altering the public gender status of female husbands through divorce, exposure, and engagement with the media. For this reason, Marion convincingly argues that the wives of female husbands should be given equal consideration in gender history. - Nikolai Kotkov
@@ Line 7: / Line 9: @@
 Stories of female husbands were used to sell newspapers and they led to the increased emphasis on sex rather than gender. However it was unknown what to do with them as they were not inherently illegal and even part of the women's rights movement in 19th century America. But the history of female husbands gives us insight into how important it was to them to differentiate between sex in order to uphold social systems between 1746 and 1913 in the UK and US. (Katherine Hamilton)
-**Chapter 1:**
+This excerpt by Manion identifies the “female husband” as individuals who were assigned female at birth but live as men and choose women as their marital spouses. The concept of “female husbands” went against gender and marriage norms, which helped to showcase how gender had strong affiliations with characteristics like class and social authority.  She makes that augment that gender is not fixed, nor does it rely on labels of identity. She explains how the topic and expression of gender is something that is historically fluid and is conveyed via roles in society, the workforce, and relationships with others. In addition, she highlights that the experiences and stories of transgender individuals are conveyed via the media like newspapers and even in court cases. Both of these outlets worked as factors that cultivated the exposure of these identities publicly. Because these stories were so public, Manion argues that the experiences of these individuals were casted into the shadows while the fear and opinions of society were highlighted. (Reiley Gibson)
+Here, Manion argues that “female husbands” lived a life that allowed them to live as men through the navigation of social and economic structures while simultaneously fostering relationships with women. The experiences of these individuals and the intersection of class conveys how the fluidity of gender and ability to “cross” between (male and female) opened pathways towards economic opportunities like access to better pay and male dominated fields of employment. This promoted upward mobility in the socioeconomic sense. With this being said, these individuals were able to support both their households and themselves through the self-promotion of social legitimacy through means of masculine presentation. (Reiley Gibson)
+===== Chapter 1: The First Female Husband =====
 According to Marion, the circulation of various texts about female husbands appears to have been the primary means of disseminating information on this topic from local communities to a broader, global media market. In this context, she emphasizes the role of newspapers, printers, and publishers, who actively sought out these “scandalous” stories for profit. In particular, the author examines the case of the writer Henry Fielding, who published a pamphlet on female husbands and significantly popularized the term. In this work, Fielding retold the story of the female husband Charles Hamilton, but he also introduced several substantial modifications to emphasize Hamilton’s gender transgressions. For example, Fielding claimed that Hamilton had fourteen wives, whereas in reality there was only one. Moreover, he placed particular emphasis on emotions as the primary motivation for gender change. The case with these narrative contributions became highly popular and resulted in over 2,000 copies sold in November 1746. The success of the pamphlet as well as its broader cultural influence suggests that Fielding’s case can be seen as indicative of the wider impact of the news media on gender relations. - Nikolai Kotkov
@@ Line 13: / Line 20: @@
 Charles Hamilton was a "female husband" who began presenting as male from the age of 14 and later married their wife Mary Price in 1746. Shortly after their marriage, Price seemingly decided she no longer wanted to be a part of the union and reported Hamilton as not being an "actual" man, leading to an investigation and trial against them. During this trial, Hamilton was cast as an immoral, dangerous trickster who had not only traversed the rigid gender boundaries of the time but had also tricked a respectable woman into marrying them. This supposed seduction, rather than Hamilton's gender itself, appeared to be the main thing that the public and the court were disturbed by, indicating that they may have been able to live without punishment had they not became a female husband specifically. Unfortunately, because of the court case, Hamilton was charged under the Vagrancy Act and was given a harsh punishment that included whipping, public humiliation, and hard labor. (Noah Rutkowski)
-**Chapter 2:**
+The English courts felt they had to make an example of Hamilton because in being able to seduce a woman and imitate heterosexual penetrative sex, they were a danger to the social order. There was an absence of a stable biological concept of sexual difference rather law, religion, and custom governed the difference in gender roles but Hamilton challenged this. Their crime was also significant because it endangered a respectable woman's honor and no one wanted this to happen to their daughters, nieces, sisters, etc. There was also an emphasis on policing intimate acts to prevent social and moral corruption. (Katherine Hamilton)
+The English court felt threatened that they allowed someone like Hamilton to slip through the cracks and live their young lives generally unnoticed or unconsidered since the idea of one "transing gender" was not something they would have often considered. I think the reason the punishment needed to be so severe is because they thought the acts that Charles Hamilton had been able to accomplish would throw the people into a state of disorder but make it seem like other moments like this are almost allowed. why Mary price sold Hamilton out remains a mystery and she was able to assert her power quickly in her testimony as to how she wouldn't have known Hamilton is not a man very easily. (Tea Aliu)
+People in society at thus time did give themselves room to play with differing ideas of self expression such as masquerade balls or the not uncommon practice of people wearing the opposite genders garments at carnivals. It is the act of having sex with the same gender and being able to have relationships and marriages with the same gender that was not allowed and seen as vile acts. (Tea Aliu)
+Fielding claimed that Hamilton had been a woman who's female lover cheated on them with a man which led Hamilton to begin to present as a man. Manion explains that this implies that in order to be with a woman one must be a man. Hamilton must conform, but in this case not their sexuality from desiring women to men but their gender expression from as a woman to as a man. This means that although Fielding's narrative is mostly false, it implies that in this historical setting gender expression was secondary to sexuality. It was not possible for two feminine women to be together, one always had to be the opposite gender regardless of their sex. However while this transing gender may have been presented as the solution to homosexuality, it was not accepted and people who transed their gender faced persecution once they were found out. (Katherine Hamilton)
+Manion sets up the questioning of the relationship between gender, sex, and sexuality. She explains how the categories that we may use today to describe a group of people-- for example transgender or lesbian-- simply did not exist exist in the late 19th, early 20th centuries. Instead, the ctegories availiable to inhabit determined the way somebody lived their life. The category that was availiable to them was "female husband". Society as a whole often took offense to the existence of these female husbands, though it was not simply the act of putting on men's clothes and living as men. The true issue that society had with female husbands was that their defining feature was their pursuit of sexual and marital relationships with women, but even more importantly, that they were successful. The way that these female husbands, after being caught, were able to partially save thier reputation was acknowledging the benefits of a woman living their life as a man, rather than dressing as a man in order to have sex with women. -Caroline Cochran
+===== Chapter 2: The Pillar of the Community =====
 James Howe was the female husband of Mary Howe who had first began presenting as a man at the age of 16 and was able to live without detection for more than 30 years. Howe's story presents the ways in which defying gender norms can lead to dangerous situations and punishments in a very different realm to those punishments given to Charles Hamilton. A woman named Mrs. Bentley recognized James from their childhood and, in 1750, threatened them with being "outed" if they didn't agree to pay her 10 pounds. Mrs. Bentley returned after 15 years demanding another payoff, and then again shortly after. Unfortunately, at this third attempt at extortion, Howe was unable to pay more than 5 pounds, so Mrs. Bentley then sent men to impersonate a constable and policeman who threatened Howe with committing highway robbery unless they paid 100 pounds. In order to take away the power of these threats, Howe was forced to publicly reclaim the category of woman, and from then on used the name Mary East in legal documents. (Noah Rutkowski)
-**Chapter 3:**
+One of the common things mentions throughout the book is the legal side, that being how to prosecute female husbands when they are not technically doing anything illegal. What was mentioned a few times, was vagrancy. The concept of being in disguise as a basis for vagrancy charges was interesting given it kind of went against the common thinking of female husbands as being men until exposed or if they were not in good standing within their community. It also alludes to certain class distinctions as vagrancy is a specifically lower class condition.(Hannah Covin)
+The nature of which they are "dealing with" female husbands seem to involve some sort of psychological terrorism and it has been mentioned a couple of times that the fact that people like Howe and Hamilton were Abe to make something of themselves and amass wealth is something that aggravated the law a lot. It seems ike there is more to the aggression at hand At face value, the female husbands are being punished simply for deviating from the norm. At a distance, people are mad that a biological woman was able to make something of themselves and people had a hard time grappling with the fact that women can do the same types of tasks that a man can. (Tea Aliu)
+===== Chapter 3: The Sailors and the Soldiers =====
-**Chapter 4:**
+===== Chapter 4:The Wives =====
+{{ https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d4/Portrait_of_James_Allen_%28The_Female_Husband%29%2C_1829.jpg?250}}
 In this chapter, Coroner Shelton was perplexed by the nature of James Allen's life. One one hand, upon arrival to the hospital after a fatal head injury, the examiner saw that he had female anatomy. And on the other however, Allen had lived in the role as a man, having a wife while working and providing for his family. These two contradicting descriptions left Allen's gender in a state of legal limbo. (Henry Prior)
@@ Line 28: / Line 52: @@
 James Allen seemed to be jealous when Abigail interacted with other women and is suspected to have been this way due to the fact that Allen might have been insecure of his masculinity because he had female anatomy. Additionally, this jealousy making Allen possessive of her might also have been a away for him to exercise his masculinity because possessiveness over ones wife was seen as masculine. However, despite this conflict they stayed together. (Henry Prior)
+===== Chapter 5: The Workers =====
+===== Chapter 6: The Activists =====
+{{ https://www.tandfonline.com/cms/asset/023c0dc1-6d99-46d0-b8ef-b6c967c55d06/ydre_a_1934267_f0009_c.jpg?250}}
+A common political strategy of those who either sought to insult and debase an increasing number of women who becoming politically active in Abolitionist and women rights movements as being "masculine." Pastor Winslow saw this increasing amount of women who sought to fill independent "masculine" roles in society as a threat to gender order and considered it as an honor and not a burden to take on the subordinate role of a woman. Although, Winslow admitted that the line between masculine and feminine is hard to draw and further complimented a woman for her strictest propriety of womanhood despite for being single with no kids. (Henry Prior)
+Other Women involved in politics used the term "masculine" to discredit their peers as male political figures did for their entire group. Mary Grove Nichols who was radical in her advocacy for free-love of women, however, was a hardliner when it came to the differences of the sexes, embracing feminine weakness and stated that “Nor are bold, masculine women wanted in this work" when referring to female political action. Additionally, Catherine Beecher attack Fanny Wright, condescendingly calling her a “great masculine person” for her unorthodox style. (Henry Prior)
+Due to these negative interpretations of masculine women, activists tried to distance themselves from female husbands and what they represented. Feminists challenged the boundaries of what was considered proper for women, including their right to public citizenship, their dress, and whether they chose to marry, but they still insisted on the maintenance of a gender binary. In their mind, bloomer dress and women dressing in men's clothes were very different. One asserted a woman's right to a //new kind of feminine dress// while the other assumed masculine dress entirely. Feminists wanted to challenge what women were permitted to do, but they didn't want to challenge the boundary between the masculine and the feminine. (Cameron Spivy)
+Manion also explains the overlap between female husbands and femenists of this time. These femenist political actors were deeply invested in the gender binary, aiming to turn that into a political weapon. Female husbands challanged the gender binary. However, it is unknown if any of the female husbands saw themsemves as feminists. While people of the time, as well as historians, have tried to associate female husbands with feminists, we don't have any evidence of any public speaking or writings on the matter. Men in this society felt that female husbands were not inherently a threat to men/masculinity, however, the fact that they were able to, not only pass, but satisfy their wives, brought into question the idea of what makes a man. Along with this, men of this period also felt that feminism was a threat to their power and self-built social consturucts. -Caroline Cochran
+===== Chapter 7: The Criminalized Poor =====
+{{ https://www.mnhs.org/hs-fs/hubfs/Mnopedia%20Blogs/IMG_5299_Lobdell.jpg?width=300}}
+This chapter examines the life of Joseph Lobdell, who occupied the category of female husband in the midst of shifting cultural understandings and responses to this role. Lobdell originally transed gender for economic reasons, supporting their family as a hunter and later traveling west to earn money and escape from an abusive husband. This evidence of a life before marriage where Lobdell enjoyed a masculine role is a contrast to many of the other narratives, which often frame the female husband's gender as intimately connected to or even originating from their marriage. Lobdell embraced masculinity in their move away from home, moving multiple times when their identity was discovered. They were eventually put on trial after one of these discoveries, where the authorities tried to use "blue laws" to prove their guilt. Lobdell was ultimately discharged. (Cameron Spivy)
+Discussing the biographical trajectory of Joseph Lobdell, J. Marion analyzes the examination conducted by Dr. Wise at the Willard Asylum. This case study is particularly important, as it demonstrates a shifting attitude toward female husbands through the development of medical discourse. For example, Dr. Wise argued that J. Lobdell suffered from a case of sexual perversion. This claim interpreted Lobdell’s choice to live as a female husband on the basis of same-sex sexual desire rather than gender identity. In addition, Dr. Wise appears to have reinforced his argument by referring to Lobdell’s aggressive behavior toward women at the asylum. This shift from the issue of gender to that of sexuality has also been noted by George Chauncey in his study of Gay New York. Dr. Wise’s examination does not follow exactly Chauncey’s defined chronology, but it is possible that the case of J. Lobdell represents one of the earliest manifestations of this dynamic. - Nikolai Kotkov
+Manion also lays out that class differences played a big role in the lives of female husbands in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. She brings up the question: is the female husband a product of a rural, working-class understanding of men? How much does the environment of that society influence how female husbands lived and were percieved by those around them. She also highlights the different oppertunity that working class female husbands had that upper class ones did not. It is virtually impossible for a more upper class, well known woman to go to the town one over, dress in men's clothes, and change her identity to that of a man. Hiowever, working-class women had more leeway. They pften came from more rural areas and were significantly less well known than more higher society women, letting them go unrecognized by those in a new town. This provided more security and less risk of getting caught and exposed. -Caroline Cochran
+===== Chapter 8: The End of a Category =====
+As women's same sex desire came to occupy a new place in the public imagination, the role of the female husband became less relevant. Female husbands, even as their relationships could be interpreted as those of lesbian ancestors, relied on transing gender to define their role in society. Their transing of gender was what allowed them to be in those relationships in the first place, and their marriage solidified their social role as men. In the midst of changing cultural conceptions of sexuality that made relationships between women visible, the female husband as an expression for same-sex desire became less relevant, at least in the way that the public understood these relationships. (Cameron Spivy)